<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greens in bonkers health policy shock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/</link>
	<description>Documenting cock and bull since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=170#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Even though I&#039;m a member of the Green Party I agree with you.. I&#039;m frustrated by policies like these but am convinced they will be ditched as our influence in politics increases (although that maybe just because doing the former is a prerequisite for the latter). 

I would be worried about this if we were on course to win a the next general election but we&#039;re not. The desirability of a strong Green party is because of how we could influence on decision-making surrounding things like climate change and other areas where their policy can appeal beyond the party (e.g. anything that isn&#039;t stupid).

From my experience the policies discussed in that article are at odds with an increasingly large number of people in the party (I&#039;m almost certain the majority of members disagree with banning stem cell research). I&#039;m only guessing here but I imagine these policies are lingering from some conference decision a couple of decades ago and have yet to be &#039;cleaned up&#039;. I can assure you I will vote to this effect at every chance I get (which we do get to do!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I&#8217;m a member of the Green Party I agree with you.. I&#8217;m frustrated by policies like these but am convinced they will be ditched as our influence in politics increases (although that maybe just because doing the former is a prerequisite for the latter). </p>
<p>I would be worried about this if we were on course to win a the next general election but we&#8217;re not. The desirability of a strong Green party is because of how we could influence on decision-making surrounding things like climate change and other areas where their policy can appeal beyond the party (e.g. anything that isn&#8217;t stupid).</p>
<p>From my experience the policies discussed in that article are at odds with an increasingly large number of people in the party (I&#8217;m almost certain the majority of members disagree with banning stem cell research). I&#8217;m only guessing here but I imagine these policies are lingering from some conference decision a couple of decades ago and have yet to be &#8216;cleaned up&#8217;. I can assure you I will vote to this effect at every chance I get (which we do get to do!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfig</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>pfig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=170#comment-27</guid>
		<description>they&#039;re also against gm food, as you would expect any well-off hippy to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they&#8217;re also against gm food, as you would expect any well-off hippy to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
