Comments on: BBC expenses non-cockbucket http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/25/bbc-expenses-non-cockbucket/ Documenting cock and bull since 2009 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:15:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Spooke http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/25/bbc-expenses-non-cockbucket/comment-page-1/#comment-84 Spooke Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:45:43 +0000 http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=257#comment-84 and then they have the gall to publish a story about internet censorship, so I thought I would leave the first comment... ;) http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jul/01/internet-censorship-map-improve and then they have the gall to publish a story about internet censorship, so I thought I would leave the first comment… ;)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/jul/01/internet-censorship-map-improve

]]> By: admin http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/25/bbc-expenses-non-cockbucket/comment-page-1/#comment-70 admin Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:27:33 +0000 http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=257#comment-70 Labour in general are in favour of the BBC as it does tend to have a bit of a left-wing lean. My understanding is that the head of the culture and media committee John Whittingdale is a Tory and is therefore gunning for the BBC. Labour in general are in favour of the BBC as it does tend to have a bit of a left-wing lean. My understanding is that the head of the culture and media committee John Whittingdale is a Tory and is therefore gunning for the BBC.

]]> By: Lilly http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/25/bbc-expenses-non-cockbucket/comment-page-1/#comment-69 Lilly Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:56:45 +0000 http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=257#comment-69 I agree, this was a complete non-story, and I've got several friends who work for the BBC who are dedicated, hard working and actually rather underpaid. Is this not part of a drive to privatise the BBC? Bang on about spiralling costs, claim privatisation will be more cost efficient, yadda yadda....? I agree, this was a complete non-story, and I’ve got several friends who work for the BBC who are dedicated, hard working and actually rather underpaid.

Is this not part of a drive to privatise the BBC? Bang on about spiralling costs, claim privatisation will be more cost efficient, yadda yadda….?

]]>