<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC lays into Chinese medicine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/13/dc-lays-into-chinese-medicine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/13/dc-lays-into-chinese-medicine/</link>
	<description>Documenting cock and bull since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Cummings</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/13/dc-lays-into-chinese-medicine/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Cummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=319#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Does this make sense to you: &quot;Robert has fathered
10 children. If I kill Robert and eat his penis and
testicles then I will cure my impotence.&quot; 

No, this makes no sense.

So why does this make sense to so many people: &quot;If
I kill an animal that is just a symbol of virility - I
have no knowledge of how many offspring it has -
and eat parts of it, then I will cure my impotence.&quot;

Animism is wrong.

Besides, if you are impotent and a true believer in
an organized superstition, then isn&#039;t the impotence
all part of your imaginary super being&#039;s plan? Why
are you meddling with it? Hmm? Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this make sense to you: &#8220;Robert has fathered<br />
10 children. If I kill Robert and eat his penis and<br />
testicles then I will cure my impotence.&#8221; </p>
<p>No, this makes no sense.</p>
<p>So why does this make sense to so many people: &#8220;If<br />
I kill an animal that is just a symbol of virility &#8211; I<br />
have no knowledge of how many offspring it has -<br />
and eat parts of it, then I will cure my impotence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Animism is wrong.</p>
<p>Besides, if you are impotent and a true believer in<br />
an organized superstition, then isn&#8217;t the impotence<br />
all part of your imaginary super being&#8217;s plan? Why<br />
are you meddling with it? Hmm? Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Cranch</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/13/dc-lays-into-chinese-medicine/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cranch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=319#comment-196</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very rosy picture you paint there, mate.

Until any particular nugget of alternative medicine has been properly tested, it&#039;s worse than a placebo. Placebos are guaranteed to be harmless, but I don&#039;t see that you can be so sure about big lumps of strange plant matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very rosy picture you paint there, mate.</p>
<p>Until any particular nugget of alternative medicine has been properly tested, it&#8217;s worse than a placebo. Placebos are guaranteed to be harmless, but I don&#8217;t see that you can be so sure about big lumps of strange plant matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
