<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cock Bucket &#187; mentalenvironmentalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cockbucket.com/category/mentalenvironmentalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cockbucket.com</link>
	<description>Documenting cock and bull since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Climate change is a religion &#8211; official!</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-is-a-religion-official/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-is-a-religion-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mentalenvironmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious nuttery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a tribunal, climate change is a religious belief.
That&#8217;s good to know. Damn scientists and their evidence.
Speaking of which, A.N. Wilson got ripped a new one in the Daily Fail for preferring fairies over science. Sane Mail comments? Whoda think it?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a tribunal, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/8339652.stm">climate change is a religious belief</a>.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good to know. Damn scientists and their evidence.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, A.N. Wilson <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1224858/Yes-scientists-good-But-country-run-arrogant-gods-certainty-truly-hell-earth.html">got ripped a new one in the Daily Fail for preferring fairies over science</a>. Sane Mail comments? Whoda think it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/11/03/climate-change-is-a-religion-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The crunchies get their panties in a bunch</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/01/the-crunchies-get-their-panties-in-a-bunch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/01/the-crunchies-get-their-panties-in-a-bunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mentalenvironmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, brace yourselves. This was released a couple of days ago:
&#8220;Organic food is no healthier than ordinary food, a large independent review has concluded.&#8221;
&#8220;There is little difference in nutritional value and no evidence of any extra health benefits from eating organic produce, UK researchers found.&#8221;
I have an interest in the subject, since my dad was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, brace yourselves. This was released a couple of days ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8174482.stm">&#8220;Organic food is no healthier than ordinary food, a large independent review has concluded.&#8221;</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;There is little difference in nutritional value and no evidence of any extra health benefits from eating organic produce, UK researchers found.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I have an interest in the subject, since my dad was a greengrocer, and dammit a good, old school one, introducing delights such as figs and avocados to the unwashed of Hemel Hempstead long before Delia Smith was burped up onto our TV&#8217;s. Decent, nutritious vegetables are not in the least bit about the pesticides on out cabbages, they&#8217;re about the varieties grown: nice tasty ones or high-yield water-filled ones. End of.</p>
<p>And yet, the forces of stupidity that are the Daily Mail, for whom black is clearly white lead with:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1203343/JOANNA-BLYTHMAN-A-cancerous-conspiracy-poison-faith-organic-food.html"><em>Despite its obvious benefits for our health and for the environment, organic food continues to be denigrated by the political and corporate establishment in Britain. </em></a></p>
<p>Okay. A cancerous conspiracy to poison our &#8220;faith&#8221; in organic food&#8221;. Oh, OK. Organic food is a <em><strong>relgion</strong></em>! That&#8217;s all right then.</p>
<p>Luckily we have Ben Goldacre to shed some light in the dark:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/01/bad-science-organic-food"><em>I don&#8217;t care about organic food. I am interested in bad arguments. Theirs has three components.</em></a></p>
<p>He goes on to roundly demolish the Soil Association&#8217;s squealing.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s reiterate the law of Goldacre: the only sure things to maintain your health are to eat moderately, exercise properly, don&#8217;t smoke and drink to moderation. Everything else is playing +/- 30% with one in a million odds.</p>
<p>But no, there is a body of people who want to feel righteous about how they live their lives, and much like the religious, feel superior to the rest.</p>
<p><a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2009/07/31/joanna-blythman-please-read-the-data-appendices-about-organic-food-before-conjuring-cancerous-conspiracies-part-1/">Holfordwatch tears into the Soil Association further and like totally analyses the data to death</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://skeptic.org.uk/news/2009/1633">the skeptic blog is, er, skeptical</a>. About the organic side.</p>
<p>Me? The more skeptic I&#8217;ve become, the less anal I&#8217;ve become about all this crap. Eat a balanced diet, don&#8217;t smoke, be happy, pet a kitten. That&#8217;s all there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/08/01/the-crunchies-get-their-panties-in-a-bunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World Health Organisation also may be making up numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/16/the-world-health-organisation-also-may-be-making-up-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/16/the-world-health-organisation-also-may-be-making-up-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mentalenvironmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Climate Resistance guys are pissing in the wind, nay the gale, of the thundering Juggernaut of the green movement. I like to read their stuff, it challenges the orthodoxy and provokes my cynical skeptical glands.
Here, they thoroughly take apart the &#8220;150,000 deaths attributable to climate change&#8221;.
Whatever you think, having global influencers just throwing numbers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Climate Resistance guys are pissing in the wind, nay the gale, of the thundering Juggernaut of the green movement. I like to read their stuff, it challenges the orthodoxy and provokes my <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">cynica</span>l skeptical glands.</p>
<p>Here, they thoroughly take apart the &#8220;<a href="http://www.climate-resistance.org/2009/06/the-illusion-and-politics-of-necessity.html">150,000 deaths attributable to climate chan</a>ge&#8221;.</p>
<p>Whatever you think, having global influencers just throwing numbers into a bucket is a tad off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/16/the-world-health-organisation-also-may-be-making-up-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NASA says climate changes might be down to nuclear fireball in the sky</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/06/nasa-says-climate-changes-might-be-down-to-nuclear-fireball-in-the-sky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/06/nasa-says-climate-changes-might-be-down-to-nuclear-fireball-in-the-sky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mentalenvironmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m gonna get into a lot of trouble for this. Anyone who knows me knows I&#8217;m a climate change skeptic. This means I don&#8217;t buy into the CO2 global warming dogma that&#8217;s being forced onto us or the vested interests that are either trying to scam money out of us or return us to some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna get into a lot of trouble for this. Anyone who knows me knows I&#8217;m a climate change skeptic. This means I don&#8217;t buy into the CO2 global warming dogma that&#8217;s being forced onto us or the vested interests that are either trying to scam money out of us or return us to some version of the dark ages. Oh and correlation isn&#8217;t causation. The world has been hotter than it is now and it&#8217;s been colder. Climate change is a constant. Always has been. CO2 levels have been on occasion much higher than they are now.</p>
<p>All that said, I&#8217;m all for reducing our various footprints and conserving what resources we have. Just show me the science not some theories.</p>
<p>Anyhow, <a href="http://deceiver.com/2009/06/05/wait-the-sun-can-make-things-warmer/">Deceiver reports that NASA reckons that the sun might just have something to do with climate change</a>. Cue crowing all round.</p>
<p>I saw <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Singer">Fred Singer</a> at the Skeptics in the pub last year and he made a gently compelling case for that lump of nuclear fusion up there maybe having a tad to do with what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Over to you lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/06/nasa-says-climate-changes-might-be-down-to-nuclear-fireball-in-the-sky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greens in bonkers health policy shock</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mentalenvironmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupid medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t think this one was especially cockbucket-worthy so I just posted it as a link in my facebook where it EXPLODED. The meat of it is that the Greens want to put alternative medicine on an equal footing with normal medicine in the NHS and find &#8220;other methods&#8221; for evaluating alternative medicine.
It&#8217;s a shame [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think this one was especially cockbucket-worthy so I just posted it as a link in my facebook where it EXPLODED. The meat of it is that the<a href="http://holfordwatch.info/2009/06/01/green-party-health-policy/"> Greens want to put alternative medicine on an equal footing with normal medicine in the NHS and find &#8220;other methods&#8221; for evaluating alternative medicine</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that an organisation that&#8217;s attempting to make the world better should be so anti-science. The very science that&#8217;s given them the quality of life that enables their mission.</p>
<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/sciencepunk/2009/05/meps_science_stem_cell_researc.php">They also have a bonkers attitude to stem cell research:</a></p>
<p><em>We would work for an immediate international ban on all cloning and genetic manipulation of embryos, whether for research, therapeutic or reproductive purposes.</em></p>
<p>Twats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/02/greens-in-bonkers-health-policy-shock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trudie Styler: hypocrite</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/05/27/trudie-styler-hypocrite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/05/27/trudie-styler-hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[mentalenvironmentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short and sweet:
Trudie Styler wants to save the world. She flies her entourage with her. She doesn&#8217;t think she&#8217;s a hypocrite. We do.
Shut up and get lost.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and sweet:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/lostinshowbiz/2009/may/15/lost-in-showbiz-trudie-styler">Trudie Styler wants to save the world</a>. She flies her entourage with her. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/may/21/trudie-styler-environment-response/print">She doesn&#8217;t think she&#8217;s a hypocrite</a>. <a href="http://deceiver.com/2009/05/23/how-can-trudie-styler-save-the-planet-without-helping-to-destroy-it/">We do.</a></p>
<p>Shut up and get lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/05/27/trudie-styler-hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
