<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cock Bucket &#187; veil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cockbucket.com/tag/veil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cockbucket.com</link>
	<description>Documenting cock and bull since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:22:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>France thinks the unthinkable on the veil</title>
		<link>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/20/france-thinks-the-unthinkable-on-the-veil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/20/france-thinks-the-unthinkable-on-the-veil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[religious nuttery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cockbucket.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a brave soul in this easily-offended world that dares step on some toes, but this is exactly what the French appear to be deliberately doing:
&#8220;If it were determined that wearing the burka is a submissive act, and that it is contrary to republican principles, naturally parliament would have to drawn the necessary conclusions,&#8221; he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a brave soul in this easily-offended world that dares step on some toes, but this is exactly what the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jun/19/veil-burka-france-muslim-women">French appear to be deliberately doing</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;If it were determined that wearing the burka is a submissive act, and that it is contrary to republican principles, naturally parliament would have to drawn the necessary conclusions,&#8221; he said. When asked whether that could mean bringing in legislation to ensure an outright ban, Chatel answered: &#8220;Why not?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Of course, the non-sequitur outrage has already begun. Not from a woman though, funnily enough:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;To raise the subject like this, via a parliamentary committee, is a way of stigmatising <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/islam">Islam</a> and the Muslims of France,&#8221; said Mohammed Moussaouni, head of the French Council for the Muslim Faith. He said the full veil remained a marginal choice for most Muslim women, and such a provocative move threatened to alienate those more moderate in their practices.</em></p>
<p>Oh, poor Islam getting stigmatised. Isn&#8217;t rendering someone unidentifiable a security issue? Maybe these garments should be at least barcoded or something. Or the people chipped with RFID so the police can tell who is who.</p>
<p>And Kudos to the National Secular Society for <a href="http://www.secularism.org.uk/mysogynist-islamist-group-forced.html">throwing a bunch of bigots out of the Conway Hall</a>.</p>
<p>You know what I hate most? Intolerant people. Can&#8217;t stand &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cockbucket.com/2009/06/20/france-thinks-the-unthinkable-on-the-veil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
